Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Meagher, D. J. Articles by Trzepacz, P. T. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Meagher, D. J. Articles by Trzepacz, P. T. Delirium Diagnostic Criteria

Motor Symptoms in 100 Patients With Delirium Versus Control Subjects: Comparison of Subtyping Methods

Received September 23, 2006; revised January 19, 2007; accepted January 29, 2007. From the Dept. of Adult Psychiatry, Midwestern Regional Hospital; Health Systems Research Unit, Univ. of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; Milford Hospice Palliative Care Centre, Limerick, Ireland; Statistical Consulting Unit, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; University of Mississippi Medical School, Jackson, MS; Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; and Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN. Send correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. David Meagher, Health Systems Research Unit, Univ. of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. e-mail: david.meagher{at}ul.ie
© 2008 The Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine

BACKGROUND: Different motor presentations of delirium may represent clinically meaningful subtypes. OBJECTIVE: Authors sought to evaluate delirium phenomena. METHOD: They used three non-validated delirium psychomotor subtype schemas, applied to a palliative-care population. Their unique items were merged to comprise a 30-item Delirium Motor Checklist (DMC) used to collect data, rate each schema, and determine subtype frequencies in 100 consecutive DSM–IV delirium patients and 52 medically-matched control subjects without delirium. The Delirium Rating Scale–Revised-98 (DRS–R98) assessed delirium severity, and subtype categorization using its two motor items was compared with the scale that used the psychomotor schema. RESULTS: In delirium, motor disturbance was present in 100% by DMC versus 92% by DRS–R98 motor items; the DMC motor items also significantly distinguished delirium from control subjects. Motor subtype classification (hyperactive, hypoactive, mixed, and none) varied among the four methods, with low concordance across all four methods and 76% concordance for pairwise comparisons. The DRS–R-98 identified the most hypoactive delirium cases. CONCLUSION: Motor disturbances are common in delirium, although whether they represent clinical subtypes is confounded by methodological issues. New motor subtyping methods are needed that are validated in other medical populations, use matched control subjects, and have higher sensitivity and specificity for pure motor features.

Key Words: Delirium • Motor Symptoms

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2008 Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us